Partition of the Indian Subcontinent and its Attending Problems: An Analytical Study

Authors

  • Dr. K.Siva Reddy Research Scholar, Department of Political Science, S.K. University, Anantapur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53983/ijmds.v11n04.004

Keywords:

Partition, Indian Subcontinent, population migrations

Abstract

The partition of the Indian subcontinent denotes the consequential bifurcation of British India into two autonomous nations, India and Pakistan, during the pivotal year of 1947. This historical partition stands as a seminal juncture, eliciting profound ramifications encompassing both advantageous and detrimental dimensions. The intricate process of partition was intertwined with a constellation of attendant predicaments, such as religious schisms, extensive population migrations and dislocations, intercommunal upheaval, and territorial disputes, several of which endure as persistent influences exerting their impact upon the region's contemporary trajectory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. Coupland, The Indian Problem, Report on the Constitutional Problem in India, Part-I, pp. 155-56.

Report of the Indian Statutory Commission, I, p. 29.

B.R. Ambedkar, Pakistan or the Partition of India, Thacker & Co., Bombay, 1946, p. 175.

V.D. Chopra, Creation of Pakistan: Historical Background in ‘Genesis of Regional Conflicts’, Gyan Publishing Home, New Delhi, 1995, p. 155.

M.A.K. Azad, India Wins Freedom, Orient Longman, New Delhi, 1988, p. 11.

V.D. Chopra, op. cit., p. 156.

Pirzada, The Foundation of Pakistan, Delhi, 1980, Vol. I, p. 24.

V.N. Dutta, and Cleghom (eds), A Nationalist Muslim and Indian Politics: Selected Correspondence of the Late Dr. Syed Mahmud, Macmillan, Delhi, 1974, pp. 159-60.

Lai Bahadur, Struggle for Pakistan, Gyan Publications, New Delhi, 1988, p. 14.

Resolution of the Working Committee of the All India Muslim League on the War Crisis, 17-18 September, 1939 quoted by Mushirul Hasan, India’s Partition: Process, Strategy and Mobilization, Oxford University Press, 1993, p. 89.

Ibid, p. 91.

Times of India, 30 March 1942, quoted by Mushirul Hasan, Ibid, p. 95.

See Jinnah’s Presidential Address to the Muslim League on 3 April 1942 in Pirzada (ed.) Foundations of Pakistan Vol. II, Guild Publisher House, Karachi, 1966, p. 388.

Statement by L.S. Amer to the House of Commons, 15 June 1945.

‘Delhi Resolution’ Passed by the Convention of League’s Lagislatures on 9 April 1946, Ibid, p. 513.

I.H. Qureshi, The Struggle for Pakistan, Uppal Publication, New Delhi, p. 93.

B.E.S.J. Bastiampilla, Jinnah and the Creation of Pakistan and Nationalism, South Asian Studies, Lahore, Vol. 3, No. I, January, 1986, p. 7.

Z.A. Suleri, The Road to Peace and Pakistan, Lahore, 1945, p. 50.

Lai Bahadur, op. cit., p. 16.

Ibid, p. 256.

Jawaharlal Nehru’s Speech on 15 August 1947 quoted by Col. Nanda, Ravi, Evolution of National Strategy of Indian, Lancers Books, New Delhi, 1987, p. 22.

Mushirul Hasan, ‘The Muslim Mass Contacts Campaign: Analysis of a Strategy of Political Mobilization’ in Rechard Sisson and Stanley Wolpert (eds), Congress and Indian Nationalism: The Pre-Independence Phase (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1988).

Hector Bolitho, Jinnah: Creation of Pakistan, London, 1954, pp. 116-17.

Indian Express, 26 November 2000.

M.S. Rajan, Studies in India’s Foreign Policy, New Delhi, p. 78.

Stanley Wolpert, Nehru a Tryst with Destiny, Oxford University Press, New York, 1996, pp. 411-12.

Nehru on Communalism, edited by N.L. Gupta, New Delhi, 1965, p. 217.

Quoted in S. Gopal, Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Vol. 2, p. 155.

Nehru, LCM, Vol. 2, p. 84.

Bharti Das, Irritants in Indo-Pak Relations, Kilaso Books, New Delhi, 2005, pp. 8-9.

J.B. Das Gupta, Indo-Pak Relations: 1947-55, Djambatan Amesterdom, 1958, pp. 188-211.

Report, Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, 1960-61, p. 24.

J.B. Das Gupta, op. cit., p. 46.

Ibid, p. 137.

Ibid, p. 137.

David E. Lilienthal, Comment Quoted by Burke, S.M., op. cit., p. 11.

Kuldip Nayar, Distant Neighbours: A Tale of the Sub-Continent, Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi, 1972, p. 93.

Ibid, p. 139.

The Exact Number of the Indian States Varies From Source to Source. The Report of the Indian Statutory Commission II mentioned nearly 600.

Security Council Official Records, 250th meeting 18 Feb 1948 quoted by

S.M. Burke, op. cit. p. 17.

K.R. Gupta (ed.), op. cit., p. 140.

Downloads

Published

30-04-2022

How to Cite

Reddy, K. “Partition of the Indian Subcontinent and Its Attending Problems: An Analytical Study”. International Journal of Management and Development Studies, vol. 11, no. 04, Apr. 2022, pp. 21-32, doi:10.53983/ijmds.v11n04.004.

Issue

Section

Articles