Do Larger Economies Trade More? Evidence from India

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53983/ijmds.v12n12.002

Keywords:

Trade theories, Gravity model of trade, India

Abstract

International trade contributes significantly to a country’s economic growth at various stages of a nation’s development. Trade promotes competition and results in a more efficient allocation of resources and, hence, higher efficiency. Trade also encourages technological progress, technology transfer across countries, and development of new products, to name a few. This paper has two objectives- 1) To examine various trade theories on how trade impacts an economy’s growth, and 2) To analyse the trade data for India’s leading trading partner countries, and examine consistency of such data with predictions of the “Gravity model of trade”. Various trade theories are explained – the “Ricardian model of trade” (19th century) also known as the “Comparative Advantage Theory”, “Heckscher-Ohlin Model” (1920’s), also called the “Factor Proportions Theory”, “New Trade Theory” (NTT) by Paul Krugman (1979), “New-New Trade Theory” by Melitz (2003) and the “Gravity model of trade” by Tinbergen (1962). The predictions of the “Gravity model of trade” are tested for India using the 2021 data of the country’s leading export and import partners. The data shows the top three trading partner countries for India are the US, the UAE and China. These countries are large economies and hence consistent with the predictions of the Gravity model. Bangladesh is India’s 4th largest exporting partner – which is explained by the historically close cultural ties between India and Bangladesh facilitated by common language and borders. Overall, we can say that India’s trade data is consistent with the predictions of the Gravity model. India trades more with larger economies and those countries that are in close proximity in terms of cultural ties and distance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Simran Sethi, Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Hansraj College, University of Delhi

Ms. Simran Sethi is currently working as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Economics at Hansraj College. Previously she has also taught in Shri Ram College of Commerce and worked with GE Capital. She completed her Masters in Economics from Delhi School of Economics and graduated from Shri Ram College of Commerce. She is currently pursuing Ph.D. from Department of Finance and Business Economics, South Campus, University of Delhi. Her areas of interest are International Economics, Public Economics and Development Economics.

References

Aliyu, S.U.R. and Bawa, S. (2013). Gravity model by Panel Data Approach: Empirical evidence from Nigeria. MRPA Paper No. 52549, 2013.

Becker S. W., Ronen J. and Sorter G. H. (1974). Opportunity costs - an experimental approach. Journal of Accounting Research. Vol.12, No.2, pp. 317– https://doi.org/10.2307/2490379

Khayat, S.H. (2019). A gravity model analysis for trade between the GCC and developed countries. Cogent Economics & Finance, 7:1, 1703440, DOI:10.1080/23322039.2019.1703440

Krugman, P. R. (1979). Increasing returns, monopolistic competition and international trade. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 9, pp. 469–479.

Krugman P (1980) Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. The American Economic Review, Vol. 70, No. 5, pp.950–959.

Krugman, P.R. and Obstfeld, M. (2009). International Economics: Theory and Policy, 8th edition. Pearson Education, 2009, ISBN 978-81-3172563-4.

Kumar, S. and Ahmed, S. (2015). Gravity model by panel data approach: An Empirical application with implications for South Asian Countries. Foreign Trade Review, 50(4) 233–249, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, Sage Publications.

Melitz M.J. (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, Vol.71, No.6, pp.1695–1725.

Nitsch V. (2000). National borders and international trade: evidence from the European Union. Canadian Journal of Economics 2000; 33(4): 1091-105, DOI:10.1111/0008-4085.00055

Rose, A.K. (1999). One money, one market: Estimating the effect of common currencies on trade. NBER, Working Paper No. 7432.

Tinbergen, Jan. 1962. Shaping the world economy: An analysis of world trade flows. New York Twentieth Century Fund, 5(1), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.5060050113.

Wang, C. et. al. (2010). Determinants of bilateral trade flows in OECD countries: Evidence from gravity panel data models. World Economy, Vol.33 (7), pp.984-915, ISSN 0378-5920.

GDP Data- https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPD@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD

India Development Update (IDU), October 2023, The World Bank.

Global Trade Outlook and Statistics. World Trade Organization, 2023.

Newton’s Law of Gravity- Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/Newtons-law-of-gravitation

Sankranti, S. India’s foreign trade surpasses $800 billion: Think tank GTRI. Wion, August 2023. https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/indias-foreign-trade-surpasses-800-billion-by-2023-think-tank-gtri-628207

Trade Data, World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS), The World Bank. https://wits.worldbank.org/countrysnapshot/en/IND

Downloads

Published

28-12-2023

How to Cite

Sethi, S. “Do Larger Economies Trade More? Evidence from India”. International Journal of Management and Development Studies, vol. 12, no. 12, Dec. 2023, pp. 11-17, doi:10.53983/ijmds.v12n12.002.

Issue

Section

Articles